User talk:Wikimeowcat

January 2019

Hello, I'm North Shoreman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wall Street bombing have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page No Activity, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Merlin04 (talk) 16:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Erebus disaster

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mount Erebus disaster; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-gadfium 09:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your Mount Erebus Disaster edit

Hello, I started a discussion on the talk page regarding your edit. Please feel free to participate. Kind regards, Brycehughes (talk) 11:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of How Do You Know Chris?

The article How Do You Know Chris? has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not yet notable per WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Captain Calm (talk) 17:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of How Do You Know Chris? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article How Do You Know Chris? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How Do You Know Chris? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Calm (talk) 16:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Talk:How Do You Know Chris?—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fuck off cunt Wikimeowcat (talk) 07:42, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]